|
Versatile Roles of the Eating Disorder Psychotherapist
By Abigail H. Natenshon, MA, LCSW, GCFP
Eating disorders remain the most deadly of all the mental
health disorders, killing and maiming from six to 13 percent of their
victims. Eighty seven percent of the 11 million victims in America today are
children and young adults under the age of 20.
In addition, countless millions of infants and young children suffer
with feeding disorders and/or related dysfunctions that may lead to early
onset clinical eating disorders. The unfortunate irony is that eating
disorders remain amongst the most highly misunderstood, under-diagnosed, and
medically and psychologically mishandled diseases; the vast majority of
otherwise competent health professionals have no idea how to recognize these
diseases or approach their treatment. The
good news is that anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa are fully curable in
80 percent of cases when recognized early and treated in a timely and
effective manner.
Every eating disorder is as unique as a thumbprint, defined by
the patient’s own heritable factors, personality structure, cognitive,
social and emotional development, as well as the structure and quality of
function of the family-based “holding” system. Every treatment plan must be
uniquely custom-tailored to match the unique requirements of each case.
Treatment effectiveness depends on the practitioner’s knowledge,
experience and capacity to use himself as a vehicle to
inspire the patient to choose to heal, and to discover the best way
to go about doing so. As a practitioner, it is critical that you respect the
power and integrity of these disorders, the role of the parents and families
in a child’s recovery, and your own responsibility and perseverance in
launching and sustaining a successful recovery effort.
Eating disorder therapists are more
than therapists; they are life coaches and parents, educators and
cheerleaders, role models and human beings.
As reality testers and limit setters,
the practitioner creates a safe learning environment, optimizing the
patient’s capacity to change and grow through the quality of the therapeutic
connection.
The Use of Self in Diagnosis
Whether or not you feel comfortable taking on a case that
involves treating an eating disorder, your evaluation/assessment of the
patient and/or early interaction with the eating disordered child and family
could provide the first, and depending upon the success of that session,
perhaps the only, opportunity for the individuals in that family to avail
themselves of professional care. Your role as a diagnostician is pivotal; in
making the first entry into the disease and family systems, and as the
stimulus to the creation and development of a patient support system, you
could potentially be saving a life. Effective evaluations for eating
disorders are more than diagnostic inquiries. They become opportunities for
therapists to educate patient and
family, to inspire trust in the therapist and therapy process, and hope in
the potential for positive outcomes, to offer a concrete, workable,
step-by-step plan of action, including referrals to other specializing
health professionals, and provide an open forum for asking questions and
discovering answers and for involving families constructively.
The skilled practitioner needs to be both educated and
educator,
bringing life experience and information to every therapeutic connection.
It is the quality of information and how it is communicated that
brings patient and family to an acceptance of disease and the choice to
recover, that initiates and shepherds the healing journey. Practitioners
must sustain a willingness to remain open, (both personally and
professionally) to new self-knowledge through a treatment process that at
times gives rise to emotional issues and quandaries that parallel the tasks
and challenges of their patients. This
learning might include accommodating the murky realities of functioning
through feelings of powerlessness, out of control, unpredictability, and
confusion within the treatment and recovery processes; entering family
systems without traversing boundaries; and fielding patients’ manipulations,
resistance, power struggles and denial.
Professionals need to learn to listen, not only to know the patient,
but to know themselves. In so doing, the practitioner fosters the
patient’s capacity to listen to
know his or
her self.
The effective practitioner is capable of holding the wider
vision or “big picture” of disease and of long-term recovery goals, even while
attending to the smallest of details in the here and now. Using the forward
momentum of disease to advantage, (s)he accesses human resources and a
variety of treatment options to propel patient and process in the direction
of healing, sustaining the vision of the possible in a morass of what may at
times seem intractable, unbridgeable, impossible. Perhaps the most pivotal
and challenging criteria for successful practice is the practitioner’s
wide-lens integrationist perspective and the willingness to act on this
expansive vision, not only in viewing this multi-faceted problem, but in
considering varied and eclectic options for healing, seeking out and
discovering resources to tap, and thinking and working “outside the
proverbial box.”
Talking the multi-disciplinary talk and wearing many
professional hats at once, each professional in the therapy team becomes a
representative of the healing process, a coach and counsel capable of
addressing every sphere of concern.
Psychotherapists need to develop a fluent, working knowledge of the
function and discourse of the medical doctor and nutritionist ands vice
versa. These diseases resist compartmentalized, as does their treatment.
As issues arise, they must be recognized, validated, dealt with,
processed, and resolved, with informed and active practitioners either
advising and/or referring back to the appropriate collaborating team member
where necessary. This does not come easily for all professionals, but is
essentially what it takes to do what works.
As optimist and integrationist, it is for the therapist to
sustain a broad-based vision of the patient’s strengths and to
reinforce patient assets, perceiving the urgent immediacy of short-term
goals, activities and requirements even while tenaciously holding onto the
vision of recovery that might be months, years or decades away.
A maelstrom of forces drives the eating disorder; the eating disorder
ultimately becomes a maelstrom of forces driving its victims and their
behaviors. Either the therapist
displaces the eating disorder as a riveting force driving patient and
process in a direction of wellness, or the evolving eating disorder can be
counted on to pick up the slack, steering the process and the individuals
embroiled in it in the opposite direction.
The disorder takes up residence within the core of the afflicted
individual, captaining the host ship from her very center, usurping her
voice as well as her judgment.
An active, directive, authoritative (though not authoritarian) practitioner
becomes the new vortex of stability, anchoring both treatment process and
patient functions, providing focus, direction, and momentum for patient and
family.
In diagnosing an eating disorder,
therapists need expansive
peripheral vision to see beyond the obvious to the elusive; reading
between the lines, connecting the dots to see what may not yet have become
fully evolved or clearly visible. Highly variable in their origins,
triggers, and symptom presentation, eating disorders present an exquisitely
challenging diagnostic process. Typically, patients fail to disclose
symptoms, offer evidence of a partial constellation of symptoms, or envision
symptoms as aspects of normal living, occurring as they do along the
continuum of normal human behavior.
(After all, who doesn’t overeat or under eat at times?)
Symptoms are typically seen as indicators of a conscientious
commitment to a healthy lifestyle, and viewed as assets, not liabilities.
Even the diagnostic DSMIII mental health “bible” cannot be counted on to be
the definitive last word in an assessment of disorders where symptoms
indicating disease are typically sketchy, ambiguous, diverse and variable in
their appearance and effect on life function, both within, and between,
cases. Because more than 50
percent of cases fall onto the non-specified category of “Ednos” (eating
disorders not otherwise specified), at best evaluators are left to rely upon
their own generally scanty knowledge and experience of these disorders, on
their interviewing skills, and on deduction and intuition in arriving at
diagnoses which are too frequently missed.
It is for you, the therapist to
connect the diagnostic dots
that may do nothing more at the time of evaluation than approximate the
existence of a clinical eating disorder.
Interpret and integrate a
complex recovery process
Once your patient has become engaged in treatment, your role
is pivotal in keeping that person on track throughout a recovery process
that can be lengthy, convoluted, and discouraging. You are responsible for
providing the patient and family information, reassurance, and a firm grasp
on reality. The patient needs to recognize what point he or she is at in the
long journey to recovery, how far he has come, the distance left to go, and
what direction he or she will need to take to recover effectively. You and
the patient need to anticipate integrate and accommodate to frustrations,
regressions and ambivalence strong enough to derail even the most committed
recovery at any point along the way.
The circuitous and complex recovery process may sometimes appear to be
elusive, and typically feels overwhelming. Your input is the lifeline that
keeps the challenges and quality of the effort in the realm of “can do.” It
is easy to forget or lose sight of the extent of the challenges that
recovery presents when you are as close to the process as is the patient and
family. Typically, you as the practitioner will need to function as the
collective memory for the patient and the family. In the end, the skill of
the practitioner is measured in how clearly the patient grasps his or her
OWN pivotal role in bringing about his or her own recovery. It is for the
practitioner to empower the patient to recognize success as a function of
his or her internal resourcefulness and commitment to health and to
understand that personal triumphs can be perpetuated, attained and/or
recreated.
Treating these diseases takes fortitude, self-confidence and
courage…the
courage to try and to fail, to arouse and resolve anger, to take on,
welcome, interpret and use the patient’s resistance as an invaluable
learning tool, to enter and positively impact family systems, to follow
one’s instincts to augment and interpret prescribed, evidence-based
practice. It also takes courage and tenacity to keep on picking oneself up
and moving forward, joining with the patient, and in so doing, providing a
most compelling model for teaching patients to do the same in doing whatever
it takes to achieve desired outcomes.
Treatment of these diseases require practitioners to distinguish
patient from disease, advocating for the patient even while battling a
disease that resides in his/her very fiber.
Fraught with contradictions and polarities, practitioners treat
behaviors in an effort to affect attitudes, thinking and problem-solving;
they help patients recover from problems that they may not recognize as
pathology or deem to be problematic; they enter family systems even while
remaining sufficiently outside of them to sustain objectivity; they offer a
recovery process that feels worse to the patient than does disease; they
treat families who may be every bit as needy for attention, support and
direction as is the identified patient.
There is no specialty that challenges the professional as
profoundly and rigorously to use the self with as much courage, insight,
sensitivity, intention or decisiveness; there is no specialty that is quite
as demanding of the practitioner to be a veteran of professional practice
and of life, an integrationist, Machiavellian pragmatist, and activist.
(Likewise, there is hardly a specialty that offers as much personal
gratification to the practitioner who is up to the challenge.)
Working with these diseases
typically gives rise to emotionally charged issues that demand clear and
constant self-monitoring.
The practitioner’s own attitudes,
personal biases, and capacity for self awareness and self-growth
all factor significantly into
effective observation, deduction and response.
For the vast numbers of therapists
who have recovered from their own eating disorder, any issues that remain
unresolved or that represent emotional vulnerability can intercept and
sabotage effective responsiveness. A practitioner’s clouded self-appraisal
leads to a lack of the resiliency, creativity, and intention, to an
inflexible and uninformed use of the self, ironically mimicking the quality
of function of the eating disordered patient.
It is critical for professionals seeking help to be certain
that they are not looking in all the wrong places… seeking linear solutions
when conceptual ones are needed, seeking theories and concepts when
behaviors are required, seeking perfection where healing resides in
approximations, seeking control where the best standards for measured growth
lie in one’s capacity to solve problems effectively and to roll with life’s
punches. Though in some respects elusive, the tools of this trade are
actually supremely accessible; in many respects they are disarmingly simple
and they are hardly strangers to us. We know them
all; we know how to implement them.
We simply have to learn which to use, when,
where and how to use them in the unique context of these disorders…
in what sequence, combinations, and in what manner.
In addition, we, as practitioners need to learn to access our most
valuable personal resource of all…ourselves.
As we eat, so we live. Dysfunctional eating and weight
management are a metaphor for more profound and comprehensive cognitive and
emotional dysfunction. Eating
disordered patients who suffer an unhealthy relationship with food more
significantly suffer unhealthy relationships with the self, others, and the
world around them.
Through the quality of their
relationship with the patient, eating disorder therapists become pivotal
role models, lending their egos and enhancing cognitive function, facilitating honesty,
offering alternatives, shepherding problem resolution, defining, facing, and
resolving life problems as they arise, moving forward with the courage to
ask and answer the hard questions.
|